![]() ![]() I like the QR code link and i include that in my label designs so I can just scan a beer and load the recipe. I can go anywhere there is internet (work specifically) and develop recipes for the weekend. I also like that its web based and not app based. I find myself using BF 99% of the time though because I like its UI better. I do notice that BF gives me a final gravity that's usually a little higher than what I get but, that is basically because of the attenuation of the yeast and I don't really fault the software that much. I have used both software's and I think they are both fine. We feel compelled to use it even if we don't want to! People are strange. But there's this weird OCD thing that happens to some of us when a feature is supposed to be used but is ignored. ![]() Now granted, one can just ignore the ferm profile in BS. It's not a PROFILE it's a running history of what actually happened. And you can record as many entries as you like. It provides enough structure - you have a date, gravity (with temp correction), and volume - but you can put in any random comments you want. I really like the BF Brew Log for that purpose. I just want to record ad hoc notes on what I did. I don't want to be constantly tweaking a "profile" that I'll never use again. And I see how, for some people, that formalizes the process and makes everything documented in a rigorous way, which they like.įor others, we prefer to improvise a bit more, just watch the beer and make changes as we observe what it's doing (how fast it attenuates, if we decide to add ingredients, etc.). You have to create a fermentation PROFILE in the first place. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |